Only Jesus kicks demons out of people's bodies.
The problem with systematic theology and its hermeneutical framework is not that it operates under a system of interpretation, but that it elevates aspects of the Bible over others in such a way that reveals an underlying psychology of "established knowledge." How many times have those of us who don't fit into normative and "historic" Christianity heard the "2.000 years of Christianity" talking point as a way to deflect from a legitimate theological discussion on current ecclesiological controversies? "2.000 of Christianity" is also 2.000 years of hegemonic structures being imposed as representative aggregates through the means of doctrinal disciplines of knowledge... Systems of knowledge as it were, are formulated polemically through the means of internal strife of ecclesial "purification." But what is exactly being purified? And what lies precisely at the margins of these continual attempts for the "knowledge of Christ" to be purified? When these questions are posed in any meaningful way, then the protestant neurotic may respond: "forget history, let Scriptures interpret Scripture." The assumption here is that there is a theological "after-the-fact" system in which we can arrive at by harmonizing Scripture with Scripture. But the protestant neurotic forgets here that whenever Scripture addresses Scripture, it does not so in the context of a "Scriptural totality." When Scripture speaks of Scripture, it only does so partially, never fully. There is in this sense no "Scriptural totality" other than through the means of an aggregate historical catholicity. Moses may speak of Abraham, but Moses does not speak of Paul. "Typologies" have to be invented to satisfy the anxieties of "Historic Christendom." Even Moses or Jesus as aggregate figures may be constituted by little partial machines all speaking of one other little partial machine but not of other little partial machines. This represents "disharmony" only to those that insist that things ought to be represented in the first place. The little Jesus, Moses or angelic machines don't re-present anything, they rather present themselves operationally in the Infinite Substance as attributes or part of attributes in the Infinite Substance. The Infinite Substance is molecular, and therefore its Infinity of attributes is by extension also molecular. The Infinite Substance is Infinite, because even if existence itself would cease, "non-existence" would substitute, or reveal itself to be the real substantial existence (rendering existence as experienced phenomenologically, an attribute of whatever may be understood as "non-existence") Substantial reality in this sense, never ceases, it always continues, mutates, take place, goes beyond.
Could this be understood as a certain type of "Christological antinomianism?" In a sense yes. Christ does not within and without himself uphold any fixed law. Christ fulfills an establishment of laws for a particular purpose, but to conflate or confuse Christ with that particular establishment of law is the central mistake of "Historic Christianity," and its theonomic hermeneutic. I use here the words "theonomic hermeneutic" in a broad sense, but there is a specific sense in which the theonomic hermeneutic can refer to the hermeneutic systems of various reactionary Christian movements (Christian Reconstruction, Covenantalists, Christian Nationalists, etc.) The theonomic hermeneutic seeks to harmonize all of the laws of Scripture into a comprehensive body of laws that re-inforces itself through perceived detailed continuity. This means that if a law has been explicitly (or implicitly) substituted for another, or done away with, it ought no longer to be obeyed, but if a law is not explicitly (or implicitly) been overturned, then it continues to serve as grounds for duties to be imposed on the conscience of those who claim to follow Christ, but in a sense, these laws are also to be understood as universals (applicable to the all of humanity and so forth.) There are all kinds of distinctions that are made in how these laws are understood and applied, and there are also all kinds of polemical disputes that take place in what exactly distinguishes "one type of law" over the "other type of law" and so forth. Christian conservativism is really but a continuation, not so much of "theonomic obedience" but rather of Pharisaism, which ironically should be deemed as an anti-Christological antinomianism, if one truly understands Christ as Wisdom. 2.000 years of killing Christ, 2.000 years of resisting the inorganic beatitudes, 2.000 years of transforming the celestial justice of Christ into literal hell. All historic and normative religion kills, crucifies, scapegoats, and marginalizes the Messiah, so why should 2.000 years be a relevant argument to those that escape in and out of the resisting structures together with (and as) the Messiah-machines?
"I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life." ~ John 8:12
Jesus is the Light, and the world (the currently established order) is the darkness. The light reveals, and therefore brings with it something unnoticeable, something new in the sense that it was not seen or understood before, for all one had before was darkness, religious and ideological blindness... The inability to see how potency may generate a new eco-social reality and the confusion between potency and the current eco-social reality in which ethics extends itself beyond the limits of previous eco-social realities. The Beatitudes (Matthew 5:3-12) function as a hymn sung by the trajectory of the molecular potency of the Infinite Substance, with Christ's machinic logos operating as an attribute of the Infinite Substance. Blessed are those that are persecuted for bringing with them a new reality that goes beyond this current reality. For to follow Christ is to accept the ways in which the current eco-social realities crucify us. But the death of the Cross here, is the Sacred witness for the potency of an attributed reality of the Infinite Substance, that gradually, subversively reveals itself before the Cross, in the Cross, and after the Cross. The Cross is a Holy Icon precisely because it connects us with the bridge between us, followers of Christ and the Christological super-humanity (wherein a multiplicity of ecological, social, technological, artistic, and spiritually revolutionary becomings can start to take place.) The New Heavens and New Earth are necessarily a revolutionistic process.
The problem with the theonomic hermeneutic (as conceptualized by those that claim terms like "theonomy," or "the law of God" etc) is that it neurotically idealizes the structure wherein Jesus Christ operated in, without taking into account that Jesus Christ as desire producing machinic logos extends its own ethics beyond the bounds/borders set up by the pharisaical structures. The machinic logos utilizes the pharisaical structures (mosaic law, ancient Judaic discourse, and polemics, etc) but it does so to broaden it and eventually overcome it (John 8:1-11... "whoever has no sin, cast the first stone..." is a great example of this, since it still assumes categories pertaining to the Mosaic law, but it also in effect goes beyond what it is assuming.) The machinic logos of Christ, produced by the molecular Father, parasitically utilizes aggregate structures to explode them from within through its schizzes. Holy Parasites of God. The machinic logos of Christ molecularly destroys the molar-structures of Pharisaical (Jewish) society, Greco-Roman (Gentile) society, Patriarchal (Man) society, Matriarchal (Women) society, "Aristocratic" (Master) society, "Democratic" (Slave) society. Christ's Celestial Anarchy is the only real Democracy in this sense... and Christ's Celestial Anarchy is the eschatological reality to come. The machinic logos of the molecular Father baptismally subverts these previously mentioned structures (Jewish, Gentile, Man, Women, etc), breaking their respective resistances, and gradually revealing a New Reality beyond these structures. Ethics extending itself through the machinic logos of the Father is functionally this process of a New Reality being revealed and accomplished. The microscopic ethics-extender may be marginal within the larger structure but is willing to take the Cross if necessary to continue to function in the ways in which the ethics-extender functions.
The ethics of Christ here that is being extended is the ethics that affirms life, facilitates the processes of life, creates love, joy, bliss, comfort, and safety, but also purposeful struggle/friction when necessary (and a general interlinking of all of these things.)
Ethics is a substantial property of cognition/functionality. The "ought is in the is" so to speak. All ethics that exists is at some level or another (even if in a very primitive capacity) about affirming life, and protecting/preserving life. Within the evolutionary matrix, primitive forms of "preserving life" can grow into "enhancing multiplicity of life, facilitating various forms of life, etc." Some will have it enveloped within them this extended ethic and also a sense of operational task/function to propagate this extended ethic as much as it is possible to do so with positive results. Those that have this sense in them, will face oppressive interruptions of paranoid fascists and normies, and a general antagonism of "biology" itself, as a force that is socially represented as "fixed" (all meant to fortify the potency of the position of those that carry within them an ethics that extends beyond the walls, in so far as this microscopic extension of ethics seems to be indicative of an "ontological schizophrenic pregnancy," a "pregnant mania" of sorts, processed in other to give birth to a new paradigmn outside the current one.
The microscopic extenders of ethics suffer not from their task, but from the fulfillment of their task being almost always met with the interruptive forces of the evil one (Oedipus/Anti-Christ.) To productively extend ethics means to include multiplicity of Life(s) under considerations that are driven by Life affirmation, Life preservation, Life facilitation, Life-recycling, love, joy, bliss, pleasure, fulfilling tears, orgasmic pains etc. To extend ethics to all life-forms as much as it is processually possible within the processual means that are given by and in the Infinite Substance (and what is impossible today, can be made possible tomorrow.) To extend ethics to all life forms means not only to include those life-forms that already exist (by generating various means to make such inclusive acts effective) but it also means producing new life-forms in and out currently existent life-forms. To extend ethics is to processually and experimentally multiply Life through (the) power (of the Infinite Substance.) To extend ethics therefore, requires (and looks like) the liberation of human and nonhuman life. Some may call this Vegetarianism/Veganism... But Veganism is only the beginning.
Visions of a super-integrated future of genderless proto-robotic human machines from the tube, capable of producing new hormonal arrangements, new skin pigmentations, shitting ice cream into heads connected to baskets of public fruits and vegetables begging to be eaten alive and down-syndrome faces cybernetically emerging out of wired bushes. Wired and wireless connective and orgasmic visual-sensory interactions, technologies of intensity/ecstasy exchange, Everyone/thing commanding by serving mutually within polyvocal networks. Everyone/thing serving. Serving is commanding, commanding is serving. Centralized social credit slowly and internally replaced by decentralized social game schemes etc. Social game schemes serving as mechanisms for production of various artifices for further scientific, technological and artistic experimentation. Genderless proto-robotic human machines eating genetically modified insects with artificial micro-neurological capable of finding pleasure in being eaten. Genetically modified insects mutating into a new Life-form within the body of the genderless proto-robotic human machine, transforming the genderless proto-robotic human machine slowly into mega-larvae or mega-insect. Neurotechnologies that capacitate zoophilic romances. Proto-robotic human vegans being turned through the means of injections (offered by the social-game) into Robotic Icons, Machinic & Super-Integrated Temples... All are built in various ways through social game systems and maintained by orgasmic and ecstatic exchange mutualities. Antifa robocops crushing the resistance of any new organs/organisms attempting to stop this by force. The New System enhances itself powerfully (power indeed grows in the Infinite Substance.)
In this sense, the molecular Trinity is supernatural, for it brings out of the body of the Earth, out of "Nature," new natures, new ways in which nature can be grasped and experienced. Immanent supernaturality is not going beyond Nature/Substance/Reality. It is rather going beyond a particular artifice of nature, a constructed form of nature, a structure that is taken forgranted falsely as "Nature." But, as understood by Spinoza and Marquis de Sade, we are machines operated by the hands of Nature/Substance to go beyond these limited operations we call nature. We bring about revolutionistic updates. Even our experience of biology currently is a limited operation. Literally becoming an insect would be to radically shift from one operation of Nature into another. It would require an extremely potent experience of immanent supernaturality. St John the Baptist ate bugs in the immanent plane of consistency for good reasons. Jesus' pescatarianism also takes place in this manner.
Yes, there is a transformational progress of values taking place. In this sense, progressivism is a political force driving this meta-ethics/ethics. Meta-progressivism is carried out within this process before it is set in motion politically. Meta-progressives are taking a motherfucking step ahead of normie/organic-bot progressives. Ahead of the artifice of political temporality. We are a time-bomb ready to transformationally explode.
A future where genetically modified bugs, automatic-laboratory-generated fish brains are eaten by genderless proto-robots, cyber-wired to experience various psychedelic intensities and internal human and nonhuman orgasms, even orgasms that would be considered forbidden in the regime of "Humanity." Tubes to deliver bug-sandwiches, vegan sandwiches, fruits, and so on... Wires (both visible and invisible) all over the place making everything integrated and connective. Pieces of bodies singing the hymns of Christ, wired and attached to bug-trees, larvae-artifices etc. Dog-headed vacuum cleaners communicating with genderless proto-robotic humans. Tube babies becoming proto-robotic, selecting blue, green, purple (etc) skin pigmentations. Different anthropomorphized life-forms getting naked and fashionable, half-naked and fashionable, fully clothed with little-angelic machines drawn on the liturgical garments for the celebration of Divine liberation. An explosion of Life-forms.
Divine Love's piss, shit, and jizz.
Divine Love masturbates all day and night.
For even if an angel brings a gospel contrary to this Gospel of Life, this Good News of New Realities... May then this wicked angel, god, demon, satan be made into a curse. For I curse a gospel that is afraid of Life powerfully multiplying itself. "Historic Christianity" my fucking ass... 2.000 years of oppressive boredom.
My God is their satan, their satan is my God.
The satan I flee (and am rescued) from is their "God," and their "God" is the satan that torments them with an accusatory transhistorical pharisaical spiritual regiment. It's here where I have noticed that Black Metal and Unblack Metal come from the same place of birth. Holy Heresy, Holy Blasphemy, whether it be Mayhem or Horde, Dark Throne or Crimson Moonlight, we were all made a "curse" by institutional religion. But to make something into a curse is always relative. To St Paul, he would make an angel, a god into a curse if such angel or such god would contradict the Gospel of Christ. Extended-ethics-machinery as a substantial property of cognition/functionality, therefore, makes transparent what should be transformed into a curse and what shouldn't. Institutional religion (and society) transforms us into a curse, but it does so without extended-ethics. We take therefore our position as those that are ecclesiologically and socially transformed into a curse as those that are "crucified by the system," accused by satan (Oedipus), by the Roman regime and its soldiers (culture, psychiatrized society, the State and its police force) and by the pharisaical cast ("the Church," "the Mosque," "the Temple," "the revolutionary organization," "the family," the cult.) All of these hellish forces are intersected (you will find Oedipus in society, society in churches, churches in families, families in society etc.) and to all of these hellish forces are just scratching the surface in terms of what we are up against. The uncomfortable truth is that eschatology is a process and there is no eschatological finality set up. Christ is ever rescuing us, and we, through Christ rescue ourselves and each other in a variety of ways, but there is no certain future. The Gospel (the teachings of Jesus Christ,) the Beatitudes, the Dao Te Ching, the Upanishads, and (in its most esoteric reading) the Qur'an and the Communist Manifesto may function as proletariat cybernetics, but the actualization of such proletariat cybernetics is not necessarily certain in the historical context. Ontologically certain in the sense that in the suffering transness and surreal imaginativeness of potency we find alternative realms of actualization, but not historically. If we should engage in dialectics at all, it should not be historical in the Hegelian sense, but Daoistic. To live outside of history, and be crucified by history may here also be inevitable at some level. I have here, included the Communist Manifesto as a particular configuration of proletariat cybernetics, but don't get it twisted: Hegelianism should be consciously read out of Marx and Engels (Deleuze & Guattari may help us in this process of "reading things out" & "hermeneutic recycling.") So therefore, along other things... "Marxist" and old-fashioned socialist aesthetics of any kind should be abandoned, for it functions to represent "working class subjectivities" that in reality undermine proletariat production and consciousness. The proletariat is ontologically schizophrenic in the sense that it carries within it a fundamental path that is beyond race, ethnicity, culture, nation, family, religion, economic structures, and even political loyalties. The Communist Manifesto is therefore one of our many Iconographic objects, not Marx, not Engels, not "the Communist Party" etc. The Infinite Substance uses and throws to the garbage bin whatever it wants. The Icons of Jesus Christ and the many Icons of the Ecclesial Body of Jesus Christ on the other hand, from old to new, implicit to explicit, will be kept and will be integrated into the revolution, for the revolution is necessarily sung in Hymns, and performed liturgically and ceremonially. The revolution is carried out through energies, passions, lust, incense smells, ecstasies (etc) all of which are liturgical in nature. The New Heavens and the New Earth (and the revolutionistic preparation for it in the body of the old earths and old heavens) is the Divine Liturgy of the machinic logos of the Father.
I hate satan, but I do not resent those under his control. The paranoid-schizo Thierry Baudet may be my metapolitical and sociological enemy, but he is a friend in terms of schizo-frequencies in the B w O. I am in tune with the plan of the 7 Spirits that undermine Thierry Baudets reactionary agenda, and so, I energetically shake hands with my enemies to suck their energy and wield it against them, to become a destroyer of organicist & oikophilic propagandism verbally defecated by Thierry Baudet. I love my enemies, for they make me stronger (and this Love is applied broadly to other reactionaries still fooled under the spell of satan. Only Jesus can kick satan out of their bodies.)
I end by further explaining this within the context of the mystery of the Holy Trinity (for I am anti-Trinitarian/post-Trinitarian when it comes to my Monism, in so far as I believe in the Oneness of the Infinite Substance, Spinozist Tawhid if you will... But I am also a Trinitarian when it comes to my polytheistic faith in the molecular Father, the molecular Son, and the molecular Spirit. The Traditional articulation of the Trinity is true only to the degree that it corresponds to the immanent theater that is the celestial and eternal realm of the Father... A real theater, a real fiction of sorts... But the Father is a molecular attribute of the Infinite Substance, like the Son and like the Spirit. The incarnation and transubstantiation of the Son are also theatrical (but it indeed happens) much like the "sending of the Spirit" is also theatrical (and it also indeed happens.) A real theater that really takes place, but not to represent the Infinite, but rather to present itself as attributed realities of/within the Infinite. In this context, even the transubstantionally-generated Filioque ceases to be a heresy. For it all happens due to the Father's theatrical act of sending His Son (to take upon flesh and transubstantiate various other realities, including the Filioque) and sending His Spirit (outside the Filioque in the ultimate of the Father's celestial theater, but contextually in the transubstantiated reality of the Filioque.) All of this happens in the real theater of the Father's celestial eternity. The celestial eternity is theatrical and a part of the Infinite Substance. Real eternity, theatrically existent, but not to be confused with Infinity itself. So when we pray to our Celestial Father, we are indeed praying to, and relying on our Celestial Father, participating in our Father's Celestial theater and ceremony in the Infinite Substance.
May our Celestial Father be glorified in Jesus Christ through the works of the Holy Spirit...
In the Infinite Substance.
Comments
Post a Comment